The Web Directory Revolution
News April 19th, 2007There has been a somewhat unnoticed revolution in the directory industry over the last twelve months. The directories of yesteryear are declining into irrelevance while a new breed of aggressive young directories are moving to fill the void.
Let’s look at the giants of old:
1. DMOZ. DMOZ is the granddaddy of all directories. Of course, there have always been accusations of corruption about DMOZ editors, but I think that goes with the territory of any not-for-profit organization. After all, if people aren’t doing the work for money, they probably have other, possibly sinister, motivations.
But that’s not the real problem. The whole site went down at the end of October of 2006 and remained down week after week. Only by mid-December did editors regain access and only in January were submissions accepted again.
In short, DMOZ seems to be an uncared about project by its owner, AOL, which itself seems to be struggling to compete on the internet.
2. Microsoft’s Small Business Directory. In the past, the advice of even the most conservative white hats was to submit a new site to three directories – DMOZ, Yahoo! Directory and Microsoft’s SBD. However, in May 2006, Microsoft announced that they were shutting down. The death of another trusted link source.
3. Zeal. A long standing trusted directory – shut down in March 2006. RIP. Owned by Looksmart – well, enough said.
4. Business.com. First it adds nofollow to its listings, then it removes them, then it adds them again, then it removes them. Sometimes it adds redirects. You can never be sure whether you will get a clean html link with a listing at Business.com.
5. JoeAnt. A formerly well respected aged directory decides to whore itself. As Aaron Wall writes: “So sad to see so many thin affiliate sites in the recently added box, and then get a second round of shock to see AdSense top and to the left on the individual category level pages.”
What does all this mean? At least two things:
1. First, there is a ton of opportunity in the directory industry. Many of the industry leaders seem incapable of dealing with the changing nature of the internet. This gives a chance for smaller, better tuned in businesses to take their place.
2. Established SEOs need to get a clue. You can’t keep repeating the same directory advice you gave last year. You should take some time to evaluate the newer directories out there, including their editorial integrity, quality of their backlinks and the people who run them. The newer directories have no choice but to be significantly better than the directories of yesteryear, as the directory market has gotten so competitive.
April 19th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
That is really a good read I agree to what you have said about new directory owners. You need to be one step ahead if you want to get a decent name out there. Being new directory owner myself, I know that only getting some high PR links doesn’t mean much if I want to be at the top. I always get some points from your nicely written articles.
April 19th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
Very well said Jeff, as it is very obvious that the floor is open and only the innovative minds will get to run it.
It is very obvious that there is future in the business but in order to expand the production some one once again innovate without that the field cannot expand.
The new owners are doing a very good job going to the top because of their aggressiveness it shows how devoted they are with their directories.
April 19th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
Nice article to read..
But sad also about those big directories are shutting down/shut down..
Surprised to read about business.com
April 19th, 2007 at 4:54 pm
I plan on seeing lots of innovation and possibly a new script in the near future, to be able to better serve and cope with the industry’s ‘needs’.
I agree with you about these outdated Seo wannabe’s reciting the same old stuff day in and day out. What worked yesterday will not work tomorrow, because times as well as the internet evolve and do change.
I plan on being part of the newer innovative directories out there, and I also plan on seeing a fair share of my peers to be along side myself in the future.
Nothing is going to hold me back from making it. It’s going to happen sooner or later.
Thanks for the read Jeff.
Rob
April 19th, 2007 at 6:02 pm
what will happen with these directories if what Matt Cutts is posting on his blog is true, google changing algo to stop paid backlinks?
April 19th, 2007 at 6:34 pm
@Rob C – Yes, I know. You’ve already done a lot in this direction.
@Urban Clothing – That’s a complicated question. First of all, I think that what Matt Cutts says is a lot of FUD. For a good write up about that, see:
http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/how-can-so-many-phds-be-so-wrong/
If what Matt Cutts says is true, then there are more serious problems to worry about:
http://www.scoreboard-media.com/paid-link-reporting-profit/
More importantly, one major distinguishing element of a quality directory is that it does not just list any website that pays a fee. Instead, there is quality control in the form of strict editorial review.
April 19th, 2007 at 6:38 pm
very good points.
April 20th, 2007 at 12:32 am
I am a part time editor at JoeAnt and have never seen the post by Aaron Wall. Will check it out now. Thanks!
April 20th, 2007 at 5:47 pm
Phat article, I hope Biz-Dir can compete!
April 20th, 2007 at 9:04 pm
You are completely right, lots of the old directories are nothing more than link farms. They do little to help web users find websites, which is surely the point of a directory in the first point.
If you dont give value to users you will die. Look at google, its helps people find what they are looking, and it does it quickly. They have just made $1 billion in profits.
Directory owners has the penny dropped yet?
April 20th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
Actually, Business.com has 300.000+ pages indexed. It’s just that they are all in a duplicate filter:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.business.com&hl=en&safe=off&filter=0
April 23rd, 2007 at 2:22 am
@Christian – You’re right re business.com. I’ve removed that. I should have taken an screenshot, because I checked and checked as I was so surprised myself.
I’ve been told that I might have hit a data center that wasn’t cached. Google apparently had a lot of sites not cached for a few days.
April 24th, 2007 at 1:57 am
Great read. Dmoz is always the first directory that I submit to, though it can be quite the ordeal to actually get listed.
It’s sad to hear that the MS Small Business Directory is being done away with – though it’s nice to know that our links will remain on their site (for what it’s worth).
April 28th, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Very informative article and discussion which i too was confused at…yes what about those big directories which asks for paid submission ??? what will happen with these directories as Matt Cutts posts on his blog that google changing algo to stop paid backlinks…???
Surprised to read about business.com too